Advertising | Metro Eireann | Top News | Contact Us
Governor Uduaghan awarded the 2013 International Outstanding Leadership Award  •   South African Ambassador to leave  •   Roddy's back with his new exclusive "Brown-Eyed Boy"  •  
Print E-mail

France’s veiled threat

Last update - Thursday, July 9, 2009, 12:01 By Ronit Lentin

Five years after the French parliament passed a law forbidding children from wearing the headscarf or any other “conspicuous” religious symbol in schools (read as forbidding Muslim girls from wearing the veil in public schools), the French government has recently indicated it was prepared to legally ban the burka.

Under the guise of defending Muslim women from what is seen as a ‘submissive act’, the French government spokesman Luc Chatel argued that women’s rights were compromised by the garments, suggesting that the government is seriously considering bringing in legislation to prohibit full veiling in France.
It seems that only several thousand French Muslim women – out of a Muslim population of five million – wear the full veil, women that politicians have described as “walking coffins”.
This assumes that all Muslim women are coerced into wearing the veil, though research has shown that outside countries where veiling is mandatory, such as Afghanistan or Iran, Muslim women veil for a variety of mostly political reasons. Some veil in reaction to their more assimilated parents; others in response to the westernisation of society; and for many others veiling spells not deprivation, but rather freedom from male harassment.
Interestingly, Jewish TD Alan Shatter has stepped into the debate with a letter to the Irish Independent in which he calls “for the current Government to have the courage to publicly state that such treatment of women in Ireland is also unacceptable”. As a Jew, I wonder how Shatter would react to a similar proposal to ban head coverings as required by the Jewish religion?
While French and Irish politicians pretend to defend women from coercive practices, the bodies of women have long been a terrain for contesting the honour of collectives and states. I agree with the Moroccan sociologist Fatima Mernissi, who argues that Muslim states often impose veiling instead of educating women and dealing with fundamental social issues such as unemployment and emigration, and that forced veiling is an aspect of patriarchal control.
Despite all the contradictions, and bearing in mind the huge difference between forced and elective veiling, I firmly believe in Muslim women’s right to veil. I also believe that the figure of the veiled woman has long symbolised the west’s orientalist colonial fantasies: the east as an unknown, veiled country, which the west needs to unveil in order to dominate and control.
Many Europeans say they are disturbed by fully veiled Muslim women, yet they are not as bothered by masked surgeons or dentists, or by veiled nuns. In the current age of Islamophobia, the figure of the veiled Muslim woman spells the threat of the unknown.
Interestingly, a member of the Irish Hijab Campaign, an Irish woman who converted to Islam, spoke recently in Trinity College about veiling as her feminist right to choose, and as her right as an Irish citizen. The veil, supposedly foreign to ‘our own culture’, blurs the boundary between immigrant and indigenous, making it necessary for state racism to intervene to defend society.
      
Dr Ronit Lentin is head of the MPhil in Ethnic and Racial Studies at the Department of Sociology at Trinity College Dublin. Her column appears fortnightly in Metro Éireann


Latest News:
Latest Video News:
Photo News:
Pool:
Kerry drinking and driving
How do you feel about the Kerry County Councillor\'s recent passing of legislation to allow a limited amount of drinking and driving?
0%
I agree with the passing, it is acceptable
100%
I disagree with the passing, it is too dangerous
0%
I don\'t have a strong opinion either way
Quick Links